Skip to main content

tv   The Rachel Maddow Show  MSNBC  May 19, 2011 12:00am-1:00am EDT

12:00 am
schwarzenegger, you can't claim to be shocked if you have seen "pumping iron." that is arnold. he's like a frat guy. i think the shocking thing is that it took so long to come out. >> well, i don't know arnld, but i've seen "pumping iron." phil bronstein from "the san francisco chronicle" thanks for joining us. the rachel maddo show is up next. >> thanks to you at home for staying with us. we begin with breaking news. in the last few minutes, al qaeda has just released a new audio recording of what it claims is osama bin laden. the first recording to be released since bin laden's death in pakistan. we had heard that al qaeda might be releasing a posthumous recording from bin laden. they say that this is it. reuters translation describes bin laden in the recording praising the recent popular uprisings in the arab world. also they describe him as expressing joy at the victory of the uprisings in egypt and tunisia. the release of this tape, of course, comes on the eve of
12:01 am
president obama's expected big speech tomorrow. mr. obama expected to address the arab spring just like the al qaeda tape addresses this evening. senior administration officials revealing tonight that the president's speech at the state department tomorrow will include comments both on the recent political change and the arab world but also on america's role in the middle east now. u.s. efforts to promote human rights and to promote democratic reform and also to promote economic development in the region. joining us now is nbc news terrorism analyst evan coleman. evan, thanks for being here and helping us understand the importance of this new tape. >> my pleasure. >> have you been able to cess out enough of this tape to know whether you think it's authentic, whether you have a general sense of what bin laden's point is in this tape? >> it's 100% authentic. the way it came out is through the electronic couriers that always release messages from bin laden, from al za waugh harry. it comes with the official logo of the al qaeda media agency. there's no doubt whatsoever this
12:02 am
is authentic. this is real. this is bin laden. it's his last message. it's interesting the message itself is only 12 minutes long. so it's relatively short. he does address the issues of the revolutions in tunisia and egypt. but you have to wonder. time is ticking. it's been several months since those revolutions came and went. why is it that bin laden is choosing now? why did he choose now to come up with this audio recording? clearly, this was in the works before bin laden was kills. they were planning on releasing this anyway. you kind of wonder, is bin laden trying to jump on the bandwagon here a little late. >> in terms of what we know about how long it takes them and the means by which they distribute these, is this the sort of thing you expect bin laden would have already known was going out at the time he was killed? >> they had planned to release this. the question is when they were going to release this. and here comes the interesting point. if you look at this recording, the way it was packaged,
12:03 am
forensically, the last touches on this were put in within the last 24 hours. that means these folks were just preparing to release this very recently which means they probably were aware of the fact that president obama is planning this major speech coming tomorrow. perhaps the idea was to try to preempt that with a final message from bin laden instead. >> now there's no indication that this is a open innocence the event of my death kind of message from bin laden? >> no. >> do we expect there might be something else like that? do we expect that this is the last thing we will hear in terms of a recording we have not yet heard from bin laden? >> i think this is the last recording we'll see. there's a possibility of a written will. but what we're really all waiting for right now is the declaration of succession. who is going to be the next al qaeda leader. there's been a lot of speculation in the media about saif al ladal. he's an al qaeda old hand. an ashura council in charge of al qaeda's security. someone who had direct contact with the 9/11 hijackers.
12:04 am
at the same time, there's absolutely no reason whatsoever to think that sai al ladal will be the next leader of al qaeda. >> why? >> everyone within the organization, everyone supporting the organization is saying ayman al zawahiri. they are even referring to al qaeda as the army of iman. the soldiers of ayman al zawahiri. as far as al qaeda's constituency is concerned, there's no doubt about who the new leader is. from what we understand, there are meetings taking place right now in afghanistan and pakistan amongst al qaeda leaders to kind of cement that decision. so again, a lot of speculation about sai al adel. he's a senior al qaeda leader. no doubt he's important. but all indications are pointing in the other direction saying it's going to be zawahiri. it would be very strange for someone who is below ranks to take a senior position over zawahiri, even despite whatever weaknesses he may have. >> so all of the speculation about him, all of the reporting
12:05 am
in the last 48 hours well al adel, do you think it's just misinformed or is al qaeda putting out that word either as misinformation or to indicate that he's take something sort of caretaker role before zawahiri moves in. >> i think it's speculation. al qaeda is taking its good old time about deciding who the next leader of al qaeda is. maybe the decision has already been made. i think the decision has already been made. but al qaeda is not exactly being quick about informing the public about it. so it's feeting the speculation to the point where al qaeda leaders are saying is it possible this is true? the reality is everyone who knows this and really understands this, there's only one person who is really the obvious successor here and that's ayman al zawahiri. if it is anyone else than ayman al zawahiri, then al qaeda has to explain why did they appoint a deputy commander to begin with? he's been the deputy commander for going on ten years. he's been identified as such in al qaeda communiques in their
12:06 am
videos in his speeches. what did that mean then? so i just don't think al qaeda can walk back that. and i think you are going to see zawahiri be appointed a successor within the coming days if not weeks. >> anything substantively different between the remarks zawahiri made in the past about the arab spring and swlat in this new bin laden tape? >> no, no. >> same line. >> what can they possibly say? they have no role in this. >> they are trying to ally themselves with something they see as successful? >> of course. they wish. i mean, that's the point. they have nothing to do with this. they didn't from the beginning and they don't know. if you talk to people in libya, there were attempts by al qaeda types to get involved in libya. they were turned away. the libyan rebels said we don't want anything to do with you. the egyptians said the same thing. the reality is al qaeda is trying to jump on the bandwagon now. it really is too little, too late. they are not part of this. the only way they can try to do this is latch on in places like yemen where things are really desperate. i think even there it's a long shot. >> evan, one last question about this. we're reacting to news tonight
12:07 am
that the new bin laden -- osama bin laden recording has been released by al qaeda. are you surprised with what we know u.s. forces were able to take out of the bin laden compound? are you surprised that it has not resulted in some other high-profile u.s. or allied strike against al qaeda? and that they are still able to get messages from bin laden out even after we got this supposed mother lode of information. >> i think the appropriate words are just wait. there is word right now there are individuals within al qaeda, within other groups that are in afghanistan and pakistan who are under tremendous amount of pressure. we'll have to see what ends up shaking out of this. but we're talking about people who are very high ranking on the list of most wanted among both the u.s. and pakistan and other governments. so we'll have to see what shakes out, but i think all indications are that, yes, there are senior leaders of these organizations, the pakistani taliban, the haqani organization and al qaeda that are under tremendous amount
12:08 am
of pressure right now. whether it has to do directly with the raid is not clear but it sure is suspicious timing. >> hearing you say that, a lot more anticipation than anyone else saying that knowing how much you know about this. evan kohlmann, thank you for your time. if we learn more about this recording over the course of this hour, we will let you know. again, summarizing tonight's breaking news. there is a new 12-minute long audio recording from osama bin laden that has been released by al qaeda. this is the first thing, obviously, that has been released by al qaeda about bin laden since bin laden's death. speaking with nbc terrorism analyst evan kohlmann tonight, he expects this to be the last thing we ever hear from osama bin laden. you have all this ch. time to mix it up with new philly cooking creme. it'll make your chicken creamier, dreamier, with lots of flavor. spread the love in four fabulous flavors. spoon in a little new philly cooking creme.
12:09 am
spread the love in four fabulous flavors. somewhere in america, there's a doctor who can peer into the future. there's a nurse who can access in an instant every patient's past. and because the whole hospital's working together, there's a family who can breathe easy, right now. somewhere in america, we've already answered some of the nation's toughest healthcare questions. and the over 60,000 people of siemens are ready to do it again. siemens. answers.
12:10 am
to help reduce the deficit, the government could, a, end taxpayer subsidies to large oil companies making enormous record profits this year or, b, they could sell all the gold from ft.
12:11 am
knox. guess which of these two options [ horn honks ] now we're hitting the road with the proglide challenge. my friend -- come on up. how do you like shaving? i don't like it. it makes my neck itch. [ male announcer ] shaving can cause irritating tug and pull. you think there's a better razor out there? i sure haven't found one. let's take the proglide challenge. [ male announcer ] fusion proglide is engineered with gillette's thinnest blades ever so it glides for less tug and pull. this thing is fantastic. i don't feel like i'm shaving. [ male announcer ] turn shaving into gliding with the fusion proglide. it was smooth. it was just so clean. [ male announcer ] gillette fusion proglide.
12:12 am
as a general rule, when you put things in charts, they are much easier to understand. i mean, something like a six-step plan to anything is sort of a lot of steps to keep in mind all at once. but when you see those six steps visually, it can totally make sense. for example, six steps to reduce the deficit. step one, reinstate the '01 income tax brackets for the wealthiest 2% of americans. okay. step two, plant an inside man on the u.s. mint police to relay
12:13 am
vulnerable late-night shift changes and lay the initial diversary explosive. the inside man and the late-night shift change. genius. next step, number three, shift medicare purchases from name brand to generic pharmaceuticals. step four, cut the black and yellow wires behind electrical panel e-41 in boiler room 2 without touching the decoy red wire, which will trip the master alarm if severed. see, this is important. you want to cut the black and the yellow wires, not the red wire. very important. step five, reduce nondefense discretionary spending by $770 billion by 2023 and step six, get in and out of the vault within exactly 11 minutes and 14 seconds, no longer. that's the official obama administration deficit reduction plan as put on a chart by the
12:14 am
satirical newspaper "the onion." that handy chart included in an article noting that president obama's deficit reduction plan includes spending cuts, robbing ft. knox and tax reform. saying the nation must face the grave realities of its mounting debt, president obama unveiled a deficit reduction plan wednesday that included pulling off a daring robbery of the heavily fortified ft. knox bullion depository. it's time to stop kicking the can down the road to future generations, mr. obama added. we must empty that vault and ensure our country's full economic recovery. reining in the runaway growth of entitlement programs and the defense budget will not be easy, says obama. neither will silently ferrying 5,000 tons of bullion through a network of ventilation ducts but just trust me on this. i've got the blueprints and i think i've found a way out through the drainage pipe. robbing ft. knox to pay down the deficit. the onion is very good at what it does.
12:15 am
what the onion does is be funny. the onion is funny. it is satire. it is not real news which is important to point out on days like this. >> some have questioned whether this is the time for the government to start selling its holdings of gold at ft. knox as well as other assets. should the u.s. liquidate assets to pay off debt? >> cnn is not supposed to be funny. cnn is not supposed to be satire. but, yes, that is the same story that ran in "the onion" three weeks ago. cnn has not done anything wrong here. it's not like they've been duped by something that was supposed to be satire like i have in the past. it's just that actual mainstream conservatives have now caught up with the satire that has been making fun of them. the let's liquidate ft. knox's gold in order to deal with the debt thing is now being proposed apparently in all seriousness by influential conservatives in the beltway. talking about the ft. knox gold, quote, it's just sort of sitting
12:16 am
there, said ron utt, a senior fellow at the heritage foundation. given the high price it is now and the tremendous debt problem we now have, by all means, sell at the peak. why not? asks chris edwards, director of the tax policy studies at the cato institute. i think it shows the government is getting serious about reforming itself. when asked about b the idea of selling off the contents of ft. knox, a senior administration official responded by saying, selling off the gold is just one level of crazy away from selling mt. rushmore. now that you mention it, mt. rushmore might be a good idea. how much do you think we could get for it? yesterday a republican member of congress from florida named dennis ross suggested that what we really ought to be selling in order to show our serious balance the debt is we ought to be selling utah. mr. ross telling reuters, quote, the federal government owns 70% of utah for example. if you need cash, let's start liquidating. sell utah.
12:17 am
sell off the ft. knox gold. everything must have g. we're not kidding. conservatives and some republicans have whipped themselves into such a frenzy over the deficit and the debt that they are advising the equivalent of trying to hack out your own kidney to sell on the black market because you have credit card debt. but that's kind of the republican mind-set right now. they are willing to do anything to cut the deficit, right? except that on the same day a republican congressman proposed selling utah, on that same day, republicans in the senate turned down the chance to cut $21 billion off the debt by trimming subsidies for oil companies. this should kind of be a no-brainer. 74% of the american public is against taxpayer subsidies for the oil companies. and a whole ton of republican senators are already on record as wanting to get rid of them. so their vote to keep them now creates a flip-flop problem for them. >> look, i said everything is on the table. and that includes ethanol.
12:18 am
that includes all subs gooeps. >> oil and gas subsidies? >> on the table. >> i voted to wipe out many of the oil company subsidies. they are doing just fine on their own. >> if, in fact, they are making such enormous profits, then perhaps they don't need the support and the tax incentives that are given to them by the american taxpayer by the united states congress. >> smart arguments. but senator john thune, senator mark kirk and senator coats, not only did you vote to keep taxpayer subsidies for oil companies yesterday, which 74% of the country is against, you have also now flip-flopped on the issue. so congratulations. same goes for you senator lindsey graham, senator chuck grassley, senator orrin hatch, senator richard lugar as well and, yes, senator lisa murkowski. all on the record opposing taxpayer subsidies for oil companies before they voted yesterday to defend them. this is a political disaster for republicans. forget explaining taxpayer subsidies for the most
12:19 am
profitable industry in the whole world when you say that everything else has to get cut. forget explaining that to the general public. how do you explain to conservatives? how do you explain to your own party's base who are fired up enough to want to rob ft. knox? how do you explain to them that this $21 billion in debt, this $21 billion in debt you like. you want to keep given the chance to drop it you'd rather keep it. how your going to explain this vote to anyone? and you are going to have to keep explaining it. this was one procedural vote in the senate yesterday afternoon to keep these oil subsidies. but there are going to be others. democrats say they'll include repealing the subsidies and any deal on the debt ceiling, for example. republicans are going to be forced to vote on taxpayer subsidies for the oil companies over and over and over again. how are you republican senators going to explain it? really? imagine for a minute that you are a republican senator scott brown of massachusetts. here's the massachusetts congressional delegation.
12:20 am
10 democrats of the 10 democrats, of the ten congressional seats in the house. and then democrat john kerry in the senate and then, scott brown. lonely read island sticking out like a big sore red thumb. scott brown you'll be almost at the top of the ticket on a ballot next year. the only thing higher than you on the ticket, only thing above you on the ballot will be the president barack obama race. if you are a senator like scott brown right now, you have got to be freaking out over the distance between what the republican party expects of its members right now and what those votes the party is demanding mean back home. remember when republican senator jon kyl said 90% of what planned parenthood does is abortions but it's actually 3%. and then his staff covered it up by saying, that 90% statement was not intended to be a factual statement. scott brown just pulled a not intended to be a factual statement on the paul ryan kill medicare plan. on friday, scott brown said in a
12:21 am
speech, "the leaders will bring ford paul ryan's budget, and i will vote for it. that was on friday. now senator brown's aides say what -- that when he said i will vote for it, he didn't mean i will vote for it. he was using the ryan budget, they say, as an illustration. when he said i will vote for it he was not saying how he would actually vote on the bill. that's the kind of pretzel republican politicians are having to turn themselves into right now in order to meet the demands of their party and the demands of political reality. which is that you cannot possibly run for re-election as the republican senator who wants to kill medicare in any state let alone massachusetts. but, really in any state. i mean you can try. you can also fly for a second by doing this. don't do it from anything tall, though. scott brown has tied himself in these pretzely knots over killing medicare. and he has now voted with almost the entire republican caucus in
12:22 am
the senate to make the national debt $21 billion worse than it would otherwise be in order to keep paying taxpayer subsidies the most profitable industry the earth has ever known. in a political environment where people are so freaked out about the debt and the deficit that conservatives want to sell utah and burgle ft. knox. you've only got 11 minutes and 14 seconds exactly. go, go, go. joining us now is ezra klein, columnist for "the washington post" and "newsweek," also an msnbc contributor. great to have you here. thanks for joining us. >> good evening, rachel. >> so would liquidating federal buildings and selling off parts of utah and burgling the gold at ft. knox, would be it substantively helpful for bringing down the deficit? >> i think it's thinking a little small, though, don't you? it's what about utah brought to you by walmart. look at all this federal property that we have that people can sponsor. look. you can certainly bring down the deficit somewhat by selling off everything the federal
12:23 am
government owns. somebody brought it up to me as the end of the game of monopoly where you begin knocking down hotels and mortgaging everything. it just doesn't get you very far. and it's not a very good idea. the way you want to bring down the deficit is in a way that will work to bring down the deficit in the long run and be good policy. you don't want to do it in a fire sale. >> the let's sell utah, burgle ft. knox thing, i think, is useful if only because it dramatizes at least the level of rhetorical seriousness on the right. i mean, this is cato. this is the heritage foundation. this is a sitting republican member of congress who are saying stuff like this. you've written recently about how important the bush tax cuts are as a driver of the current deficits. is there anybody on the republican side who is being as serious in their actual fiscal conservativism as these guys are in their rhetoric? is there anybody who is consenting to roll those taxcuts back for the sake of the deficit?
12:24 am
>> to my knowledge, there is not one elected republican in the house or the senate who is saying that we should not extend the bush tax cuts, all of them, permanently or even that we should just not extend the bush tax cuts for upper income earners. it's worth going back through the numbers. if you look at every peace of policy we've enacted since 2001, since when we were looking at surpluses, when george w. bush was elected, the single piece of policy that has done the most to turn us from surplus to deficit were the tax cuts. much more than a trillion dollars. and what's really even more remarkable about them is to get them off of the books because they go up to like $4 trillion in the next ten years. it gets even bigger. to get them off the books you'd have to do nothing. and in the senate, and in the house, nothing is easier to do than nothing. nothing can't be filibustered. nothing is hard to vote down. they could just do nothing and that would be a big step towards repairing the deficit. but that step, according to them is not even on the table. so i'm not saying republicans have to lead with tax cuts. that's not the argument. that's not what there a want or
12:25 am
what they think is best and that's fair enough. but if you believe the deficit to be an overriding priority you have to be willing to put the single policy that did the most to bring us down to deficits, repealing it on to the table or letting it expire on to the table. and if not, and you are joking around with selling off ft. knox and selling off utah and liquidating whatever federal buildings we have, that may all be fine. if you aren't talking about the big drivers here, you're not being serious about it. >> one way they claim policy seriousness is they tend to form gangs. they take small groups of senators and they isolate them from the public spotlight and say, we want you guys to negotiate in secret, in private without the glare of the spotlight on you. we want you to give each other bipartisan cover and you guys come up with something that people who are acting in public would be too cowardly to do. one of these gangs right now, is, of course, the gang of six in the senate which tom coburn appears to have blown up by leaving this week. do you think that there's any
12:26 am
great loss for the -- for significant seriousness in the u.s. senate on economic policy to have the gang of six go away? are they showing any promise? >> they were working hard. i'm not going to take that away from them. i thought it was very brave that tom coburn was going toe toy to on taxes. it was something very promising about that. something very promising until the day coburn dropped out of it. the senate has had a lot of these gapgs. there was the original gang of six. the wyden/bennett process. and what they all have in common is failure. the gang of five now is not done yet so maybe they'll pull it out. but what doesn't seem to work is pretending that simply by getting in a room and saying you're going to be willing to overcome the forces of inertia and polarization in the senate you can actually either do it yourself or get other people to do it. what tends to happen is you get a lot of good press for a while and then realize nobody outside the walls of that room is a, going to go for your deal but, b, let you live in you go for your deal.
12:27 am
and then you yourself or a couple of the people in there start turning against the deal as chuck grassley did and as tom coburn did now. this may be how we would like the senate to work that a couple of brave senators can get together and sort of mr. smith goes to washington it but it doesn't appear to be how the senate works. we go through the normal leadership channels when we need to actually get things done. >> ezra klein, columnist for "the washington post" and "newsweek" and msnbc contributor. >> thank you, rachel. for most politicians, saying that john mccain -- john mccain doesn't understand torture, that would be the epic career failure to end all epic career failures. but when you are rick santorum, turns out that's just tuesday. the unexpected new development in the amazing rick santorum/john mccain story of this week. that is coming up next. ll we nes change the way
12:28 am
we're thinking about them. a couple decades ago, we didn't even realize just how much natural gas was trapped in rocks thousands of feet below us. technology has made it possible to safely unlock this cleanly burning natural gas. this deposits can provide us with fuel for a hundred years, providing energy security and economic growth all across this country. it just takes somebody having the idea, and that's where the discovery comes from. it just takes somebody having the idea, ooh, the price sure doesn't. i'm tired of shopping around. [ sigh ] too bad you're not buying car insurance. like that's easy. oh, it is. progressive direct showed me their rates and the rates of their competitors. i saved hundreds when switching. we could use hundreds. yeah. wake up and smell the savings. out there with a better way. now, that's progressive.
12:29 am
[ male announcer ] in 2011, at&t is at work, building up our wireless network all across america. we're adding new cell sites... increasing network capacity, and investing billions of dollars to improve your wireless network experience. from a single phone call to the most advanced data download, we're covering more people in more places than ever before in an effort to give you the best network possible. at&t. rethink possible.
12:30 am
12:31 am
quick follow-up on the lead story from last night's show. in the wake of some republicans' efforts to try to keep president obama from getting political benefit from killing osama bin laden in the wake of some republicans' efforts to credit george w. bush for getting bin laden instead of the current president, republican senator john mccain last week took to "the washington post" editorial page and to the senate floor to rebut claims made by those in his own party that torture was
12:32 am
somehow responsible for getting bin laden. it wasn't. the head of the cia says it wasn't. and the head of the cia is in a position to know. but in trying to keep the america loves torture argument alive on the right, republican presidential candidate rick santorum has now told a conservative radio host this week that john mccain is wrong. despite the evidence. rick santorum says john mccain does not know what he's stalking about because john mccain just doesn't understand torture. according to mr. santorum, quote, he doesn't understand how enhanced interrogation works. i mean you break somebody and after they are broken, they become cooperative. john mccain doesn't understand torture? not like rick santorum does. that's what rick santorum said. senator mccain, of course, needless to say, endured torture at the hands of his interrogate lors during five years at a prisoner of war in vietnam. rick santorum, no, nothing like that.
12:33 am
senator mccain's daughter megan sweeted about this. rick santorum telling my father doesn't know -- saying my father doesn't know about tort surlike carrot top telling lebron james he doesn't know about basketball. rick santorum astonishingly has not apologized for his comments. i know because i have been googling the word santorum all day and now i'm fired. rick santorum did tell cnn it is outrageous and unfortunate that anyone even thinks he should apologize for this. i do not usually say things like must or even should on this show. but in this case, clearly rick santorum must apologize. it is unimaginable that he will not apologize for this. until that happens, though, we will bide our time waiting for the apology by enjoying the pitch perfect response from senator mccain's staffers and friends and family. in addition to their daughter's tweet about carrot top and lebron james, senator mccain's wife cindy tweeted simply,
12:34 am
really? imagine presidential candidate santorum saying my husband senator john mccain doesn't understand torture. really? when greg sargent at "the washington post" wrote to mccain's senate office to get a response to mr. santorum, senator mccain's spokesman brook buchanan wrote back this one-word response, who? senator mccain's longtime staffer mark salter laid it out perhaps the most plainly on his facebook page. mr. salter wrote, quote, for pure blind stupidity, nobody beats santorum. in my 20 years working in the senate, i never met a dumber member, which he reminded me of today. do you remember what laurence wilkerson said about the neocon guy doug fife? he said seldom in my life have i met a dumber man. general tommy franks called the same guy the dumbest f'ing guy on the planet, except he didn't say f'ing. doug feith was the guy who came
12:35 am
up with all the alternative intel on iraq and 9/11 that said whatever the administration wanted it to say to justify that war. doug feith still says everything he cooked up, no need to apologize. for that, doug feith will always be the guy tommy franks called the dumbest f'ing guy on the planet. he will always be the guy of whom lawrence wilkerson said seldom have i met a doumer man. and until rick santorum apologized to senator john mccain for saying that john mccain doesn't understand torture as well as rick santorum does, until rick santorum apologizes for that, rick santorum will always be the guy who inspired a republican senate staffer to say, in my 20 years working in the senate, i have never met a dumber member. for pure blind stupidity, no one beats santorum. on the bright side, if rick santorum does become widely known as the single stupidest senator to have served in the
12:36 am
united states senator in 20 years, that would be an upgrade from his top search engine results if you google the name santorum right now. hey buddy, wattaya lookin' a-oooh.
12:37 am
♪ [ female announcer ] mini, meet berries. introducing new kellogg's frosted mini-wheats with a touch of fruit in the middle. helloooooo fruit in the middle. long before a cummins diesel engine powered a ram truck.. it roared to life out here. and proved itself here, here, and here. and it's now delivering best-in-class towing, here. and unsurpassed torque, here. the ram 5 year 100,000 mile warranty covers you everywhere. ram. an accident doesn't have to slow you down. introducing better car replacement,
12:38 am
available only with liberty mutual auto insurance. if your car is totaled, we give you the money for a car one model year newer. to learn more, visit us today. responsibility. what's your policy? look at all this stuff for coffee. oh there's tons. french presses, espresso tampers, filters. it can get really complicated. not nearly as complicated as shipping it, though. i mean shipping is a hassle. not with priority mail flat rate boxes from the postal service. if it fits it ships anywhere in the country for a low flat rate. that is easy. best news i've heard all day! i'm soooo amped! i mean not amped. excited. well, sort of amped. really kind of in between. have you ever thought about decaf? do you think that would help? yeah. priority mail flat rate shipping starts at just $4.95, only from the postal service. a simpler way to ship.
12:39 am
as i mentioned with ezra klein earlier in the show, until last night there was a gang of six working on ideas to reduce the deficit in washington. now it is a gang not of six, but a gang of five because senator tom coburn of oklahoma quit. as "the washington post" put it, the group had appeared to be tantalizingly close to an agreement but then senator coburn started bringing up new issues at every meeting or demanding old ones be reconsidered. coburn began pressing for sharper cuts to social security that had previously been agreed to. during a three-hour session late monday, coburn demanded deep and immediate cuts to medicare that went beyond anything previously proposed. in "the washington post" telling greg sargent's plumline blog "the senators got into a heated argument on monday night after coburn demanded an additional $130 billion in medicare cuts. quoting an aide familiar with the talks, coburn came in on monday and said, i want to $130 billion. the conversation was heated. there was yelling.
12:40 am
democratic senator dick durbin said i am not doing this. that destroys medicare. that goes even further than paul ryan. we are not doing it. so tom coburn quit. senator coburn afterward telling reporters that we can't get there, describing the talks as at an impasse. his office telling reporters that senator coburn has numerous concerns. all of which i have to say we found very exciting today. not because of the substance of what senator coburn and his office are complaining about now but, frankly, because they are talking about anything at all. that is exciting because all day long, all week long, we have been trying to get any sort of confirmation or denial or any comment whatsoever from senator coburn about whether he was one of the reluctant witnesses in the john enson investigation who had to be granted immunity in exchange for him testifying to the justice department and ethics committee. about senator coburn's own role in covering up john ensign's
12:41 am
affair in negotiating a financial payout to ensign's mistes in pa sill tating the illegal lobbying career ensign arranged for the mistress' husband as part of the cover-up and payoff. as the hill newspaper editorialized this week, the ethics panel obtained immunity orders for certain witnesses. was senator tom coburn one of them? senator coburn, the hill says, should break his silence this week and comment on the ethics committee's report. we agree. we have been calling all day long, all week long to try to get him to explain. so far, nothing. we can't even get a no comment from them anymore. we will keep trying. professional driver on a closed course. ♪ do not attempt at home. always wear your seat belt. ♪ and please drive responsibly. [ male announcer ] it's the most fun you can legally have.
12:42 am
see your authorized mercedes-benz dealer for exceptional offers on the c-class.
12:43 am
this time last week, newt gingrich launched his campaign for the republican nomination for president. then on sunday, newt gingrich metaphorically blew that campaign up when on "meet the press" he called the ryan plan imposing radical change. he's since put out a video
12:44 am
taking back that statement and apologized to paul ryan personally. he's also denounced the whole thing as a liberal media plot. now mr. gingrich has said that no one is allowed to quote what he said on "meet the press." >> so let me say on the record, any ad which quotes what i said on sunday is a falsehood. >> when you say on the record, what do you mean by that, sir? the mind-bending eshish like, i didn't say that thing, i said weirdness of his flailure on this issue i think is exceeded only by the best new thing in the world tonight. a campaign staffer who was caught up in this big gingrich mess did something so awesome about it today that on a day when the sun never came out and the water cooler finally broke and the mexican food delivery was late and stale and bill ran out of nicorette and the meeting went late and everyone on the staff was super grumpy all day long. on this day a campaign staffer
12:45 am
tied to the newt gingrich story made our whole newsroom really happy for like an hour this afternoon. and, therefore, that thing is the best new thing in the world today. it's coming up right at the end of the show.
12:46 am
this is one of the people who is in the running in last night's election for the republican party chairmanship of dallas county in texas. >> there's an elephant in the room, a weak elephant. do you know what i mean?
12:47 am
in the november 2010 elections, dallas county bucked a national trend where republicans won races around the country. the dallas county republicans lost every race. every single one. the problem is not necessarily a person. it's a mind-set. a mind-set that says we always have to do everything the way we always have. it's an establishment mind-set. and that mind-set has got to stop. >> spoiler alert to this campaign video. that person, debbie jordados did not win last night's race to win the republican party in dallas county. she lost the vote 140 to 95 despite the baby elephant being washed by too much water too fast. despite the nonsec with ir cut-ins from metropolis. this video was not enough to put its maker over the top.
12:48 am
thanks to the dallas observer and the huffington post, putting this video up online today, this little peek into how republicans lobby each other in to how internal republican politics are getting conducted in places like texas it does shed some useful light on one republican issue that is otherwise kind of a mystery to interested observers. watch. we did not -- this is a little more from that video. the weird jump cuts make it look like we internally edited this. we did not. this is just how it is. watch. >> we must fearlessly confront one of dallas county's most pressing problems. voter fraud. without fair and honest elections, liberty is just a word. as astronomers know, the supermassive black hole is the most destructive force in the universe. it literally sucks in and destroys everything within its reach. we don't want dallas county to
12:49 am
become the supermassive blue hole because we all know what that looks like. >> don't we all know what that looks like? voter fraud turns places like dallas into super massive blue holes. on the strength of arguments like that, the legislature in texas has just passed and governor rick perry is expected to sign a bill to make it way harder to vote in texas. because of the threat of voter fraud. because the massive blue hole thing must be stopped. but it's happening everywhere that republicans control state legislatures. in new hampshire, where a republican wisconsin-style union stripping effort may be driving a little bit of a lack back, a state assembly special election in a strongly republican district went to the democratic candidate, but voters at one precinct were warned that they needed to show photo i.d. in order to vote. voters do not need to do that in new hampshire but it was a nice reminder that new hampshire republicans in the state legislature are trying to change
12:50 am
that to force photo i.d. in wisconsin itself where a major recall effort is under way after governor scott walker and republicans wildly unpopular union stripping adventure, republicans there, too, are scurrying to pass one of the most restrictive voting laws in the entire country. it would be a radical change for wisconsin. it would also be an expensive change. wisconsin's voter restriction bill expected to have multimillion-dollar start-up costs for the state and additional multimillion-dollar implementation costs every year thereafter. in a state where budget concerns are supposedly what's driving all kinds of public policy radicalism, wisconsin has never considered before, what justifies huge new state expenditures to make it harder to vote? what could be that scary? >> the super massive blue hole because we all know what that looks like. >> joining us is tovia, senior democracy fellow. she's an expert on election reform. thanks for your time. appreciate it.
12:51 am
>> no problem. good to be here, rachel. >> is the blue hole of doom here the risk that too many democratic leaning voters will find it too easy to vote? do these have a clear partisan intention as far as you are concerned? >> oh, absolutely. you know, what we're seeing right now across the country is really unprecedented in several generations. we are seeing these type of voter i.d. laws being introduced, processed and passed in a number of states. it's going to pass in wisconsin, probably this week and be signed by governor walker. as you said in texas. in tennessee. nicky hailey passed a bill -- signed the bill today with the backdrop of the black eyed peas in the backdrop playing. celebratory kind of atmosphere. the republicans know and now that they are dominating the state legislatures, they have been able to take certain actions that will disenfranchise people of color, low-income people, young people who they believe are more likely to vote for democrats in 2012.
12:52 am
>> are there widespread credible reports of voter fraud that would be fixed by these types of new voting restrictions and that are serious enough to balance out a number of people who probably won't be able to votes but of these laws? >> that's just it. the right does a great job of conflating all the different types of possible voter froud that could go on whether it's absentee fraud or problems with the registration system. the only type of fraud that an i.d. would address would be impersonation at the polls which virtually never happens. at the same time, we also know in each of the states we're talking about in the magnitude of hundreds of thousands of people don't have the kind of identification that they want to require people show in order to vote. and it's disproportionately again people of color, low-income people, the elderly and young people who they just don't seem to want to have voting. >> democrats do not seem to be nearly as motivated on this legislatively as republicans are. whenever i ask democratic elected officials they'll say they are, but in terms of what's
12:53 am
evidence in their actions, there really is no legislative counterattack by democrats. in the absence of that, are there ways to mitigate the depressive effect that these new restrictions are likely to have on voting, especially because we're heading into a presidential election year and they are disproportionately likely to affect democratic voter leaning groups. >> in the states it's still in play, we're certainly trying to mitigate the worst effects. in places like wisconsin and texas where they are about to be signed, they're not allowing for student i.d. even to be one of the acceptable i.d.s, even if it's from a public university. we've been working hard to at least mitigate that kind of bad addition to the bills. but clearly these are going to pass, clearly the department of justice is going to have a role to play in this in some states, and there will be lawsuits for sure. and then at a certain point we're going to have to launch a campaign in this country in these states to make sure that each and every one of our citizens has the kind of i.d.
12:54 am
that they need in order to vote so that people's voting rights are not violated and we have a fair election. >> tova andrea wang, thank you very much for your insight tonight. really appreciate it. >> thank you. do you need to buy a gift for the hard-core birther in your life? how about a coffee mug that shows president obama's long form birth sift, made in the usa and proceeds benefit the obama campaign. ed schultz talks about the obama white house's piece of political judo that is this mug. that is right after this show. coming up here first, though, the best new thing in the world today which comes surprisingly from the campaign of a candidate for president. it is joy and amazement from a very unexpected source. that is coming up right after this. >> announcer: this past year alone there's been a 67% spike in companies embracing the cloud-- big clouds, small ones, public, private,
12:55 am
even hybrid. your data and apps must move easily and securely to reach many clouds, not just one. that's why the network that connects, protects, and lets your data move fearlessly through the clouds means more than ever. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] doctors have been saying it forever. let's take a look. but they've never actually been able to do it like this. let's take a look. v-scan from ge healthcare. a pocket sized imaging device that will help change the way doctors see patients. that's better health for more people. these wheat thins crunch stix will save us. [ crunch ] look! [ male announcer ] wheat thins crunch stix.
12:56 am
try our new flavors. i used to not travel very much, but then i discovered hotwire. now, i use all my vacation days. i can afford to visit my folks for the holidays. and reconnect with my girlfriends in vegas.
12:57 am
because i get ridiculously low prices on all my trips. you see, when hotels have unsold rooms, they use hotwire to fill them, so i get 4-star hotels for up to half off. now i can afford a romantic trip to new orleans. hi honey! ♪ h-o-t-w-i-r-e... ♪ just don't feel like they used to. are you one of them? remember when you had more energy for 18 holes with your buddies. more passion for the one ya love. more fun with your family and friends. it could be a treatable condition called low testosterone or low t. come on, stop living in the shadows. you've got a life to live. [ male announcer ] so don't blame it on aging. talk to your doctor and go to to find out more.
12:58 am
okay. i am so looking forward to this. the best new thing in the world today comes from newt gingrich's presidential campaign. when asked by the huffington post to respond to the drubbing mr. gingrich has taken in the media in his campaign's first week, mr. gingrich's press secretary rick tyler wrote something incredible. he wrote something that is not the kind of thing that usually turns up in u.s. politics. i'm not sure it's the kind of thing that turns up in any country's politics. it's more like an ancient ode, an epic or something just way more florid and ambitious than you ever come across in transactional daily life. it is amazing. it is also narratively alittle hard to follow. so we photo shop illustrated parts of it to try to show what exactly mr. gingrich's campaign is saying. i am not going to edit this at all to be fair. here it is.
12:59 am
the litarato sent out their mignons to do their bidding. washington cannot tolerate threats from outsiders who might disrupt their comfortable world. the firefight started when the cowardly sensed weakness. they fired timidly at first, then the sheep not wanting to be dropped from the establishment's cocktail party invite list unloaded their entire clip firing without taking aim their distortions and falsehoods. now they're left exposed by their by lines and handles but surely they had killed him off. this is the way it always worked. a lesser person could not have survived the first few minutes of the onslaught. but out of the billowing smoke and dust of tweets and trivia emerged gingrich once again ready to lead those who won't be intimated by the politically elite and are ready to take on the challenges america faces. ladies and gentlemen, the best new thing in the world today courtesy of illustrations by our producer will and co


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on